The Hidden Connection Between Windows and Google Chrome Logo
Via Amit Agarwal.
Image Credit: oneBlog
A research oriented blog about Web Information Systems, Data Science, Learning Technologies, knowledge Management, and me...
Via Amit Agarwal.
Image Credit: oneBlog
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:12 AM 0 comments
On Monday, Microsoft announced that it would give every Windows Live user an OpenID account, and yesterday, Google formally announced its support as a provider for the OpenID 2.0 protocol, i.e. If you have a Google account, you can also start using it as an OpenID. Google has launched an API that allows other websites to provide users with the option to login using their Google Account.
Eric Sachs from the Google Security Team writes:
Starting today, we are providing limited access to an API for an OpenID identity provider that is based on the user experience research of the OpenID community. Websites can now allow Google Account users to login to their website by using the OpenID protocol.
We chose OpenID as the protocol for our identity provider because it makes a large set of open source implementations available for many different development platforms used by Google Data API developers. To learn more about this new API see http://code.google.com/apis/accounts/docs/OpenID.html.Update (Oct. 31)
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:21 AM 0 comments
In this presentation, Ton Zijlstra presents his fully networked and connected day.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:53 AM 0 comments
Labels: Connectivism, Learning Management
OpenID - the "free and easy way to use a single digital identity across the Internet" - is now supported by Microsoft Windows Live. Microsoft describes OpenID as the "emerging, de facto standard Web protocol for user authentication". According to Microsoft "We look forward to making it easier for our users to access the Web sites they use, by reducing their need to create additional identity accounts. That is the promise of OpenID. We are happy to support that goal by providing OpenID-based sign-in functionality to Windows Live ID account holders".
Windows Live ID OpenID Provider Screencast from Angus Logan on Vimeo.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:24 AM 0 comments
What did others say about Instructional/Learning Design:
- Adrian: “For some learners, however, we know that the linearity of courses that have been developed with a lock-step linear scope and sequence are not desirable, with the exception of their being the means to accreditation or certification”.
- Inez: “As we design instruction, it is important to remember that we're not building a path or constructing a house as much as we are nurturing a garden”.
- Bradley: “What I have come to realize is that up to 2 years ago, I often relied on others description of who the learner/user was. I never got to meet the learners; instead I relied on
- Lani: “Those rules in the districts in which I worked were stringent, imposed not by educators but technicians interested in security, not learning. And they prevented, and continue to prevent, learners from making important connections with content, with people, with ideas, with networks, with the world... I’m wondering if the instructional designs I’ve developed in Blackboard don’t hold some similarity to the notion of that impenetrable firewall?” – I like the ID-Firewall analogy made there.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 4:08 PM 0 comments
Labels: CCK08, Connectivism, Learning Management
Grainne Conole gave a presentation on learning design (LD) at CCK08. The slides are available on Slideshare. Actually I’m not a fan of LD, for two main reasons:
Firstly, learning is complex and multifaceted to be captured within a LD model. Learning design is a complex task, due to the dynamics of the learner’s knowledge and the diversity of the parameters that should be taken into consideration in the design equation, such as the context of the learning environment, the nature of the learning activity, learning styles/goals/preferences, motivation, cognitive capacities, disabilities, etc. LD suggests predefined inputs and outcomes. However, in learning, neither the input can be predetermined, nor the outcome can be anticipated. In learning, a wide range of interacting entities produce unpredictable outcomes. It is an illusion that learning can follow a clear predetermined direction, controlled by predefined condition-action rules.
Secondly, LD is specified with control in mind, and thus cannot be easily adopted by learners. In fact, LD prescribes a sequence of activities for a learner, which are carried out in a particular environments initiated and controlled by learning designers, rather than the learners themselves. In my opinion, If we insist to have LD, then it should be LD triggered by the learner; i.e. personal learning design.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:54 AM 0 comments
Labels: CCK08, Connectivism, Learning Management
Social media gurus talking about their biggest social networking mistakes (by David Spark):
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 11:12 AM 0 comments
Labels: Social Software, Web 2.0
Via Kevin Purdy.
Digital Inspiration's 15-point guide, "How to Do Stuff with Google Docs," explains how to convert, import, sync, translate, and tweak your documents in myriad ways.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 11:03 AM 0 comments
Labels: Google
Sebastian Kelle sent around this call for participation in the TENCompetence Winter School 2009. My dear friend Milos Kravcik is on the organisation committee. An event that I highly recommend to everyone interested in Personal Learning Environments.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 5:28 PM 0 comments
Labels: Learning Management, Mashup, PLE
Via George Siemens.
A nice slideset from a presentation by Peter Tittenberger at the International Arab Conference of eTechnology.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 11:10 AM 0 comments
Labels: Learning Management
Via Jochen Robes.
A good presentation by Gabi Reinmann on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) at the " 6. Karlsruher Symposium für Wissensmanagement". The transcript of her presentation is availabe here (.pdf, in German).
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:58 AM 0 comments
Labels: Knowledge Management
In this article, Richard McDermott, who co-authored the book "Cultivating Communities of Practice" together with Etienne Wenger and Bill Snyder, notes that a rethinking of the concept of Communities of Practice (CoPs) is needed. From a three-year study he conducted, McDermott concludes that some of his initial ideas on CoPs were wrong. He writes:
We believed that CoPs were essentially informal, voluntary groups of peers. We thought that goals and deliverables would inhibit people’s openness and the community’s ability to help each other with everyday work problems. We believed that companies could seed communities, but that they would evolve on their own over time, finding their own emerging focus and level of activity.Communities of practice were essentially, we thought, part of the ‘underground’ organisation, operating 'under the radar', below the formal structure, and marginal to official organisational authority. We concluded, as a result, that healthy communities depended on the passion of the members, active leadership and hands-off support from the corporation.
But as more and more organisations have implemented CoPs over the past dozen or so years, our understanding of the role of communities in the organisation has changed. While some of our earlier ideas have been confirmed, others, we have found, were simply wrong.
Informal groups of peers, sharing their insights and help with the blessing of management – but little more – do sometimes continue under their own momentum. But many, contrary to our original thinking, fade away. Most of the healthy communities in these companies are more like other ‘official’ organisational structures than dramatically different from them.
McDermott continues to note that:
All of the communities had been in existence for at least two years and many for five or more. Our initial findings were mixed. About one-third of the communities of practice we examined in most of these organisations were floundering or dead.
In my opinion, the death of CoPs is mainly due to the fact that our personal networks, not CoPs, are our real knowledge homes. We tend to rely on our personal networks to learn/work, rather than participating in a CoP that is assembled through and controlled by outside forces. From my experience in participating in different CoPs, groups, and controlled networks, over time, most of these social forms have dissolved leaving place to multiple personal networks. Whereas several CoPs - that I was supposed to be a member thereof - do not exist anymore, my personal knowledge network (PKN) is still alive and has been extended over time with a myriad of selected knowledge nodes (e.g. smart people that I used to know during my work in different projects or from my blogging activities).
Related Posts:
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 12:30 PM 0 comments
Labels: Communities, Knowledge Ecology, Knowledge Management, Learning Management, PLE
Via Mary Abraham.
Dave Snowden has updated his famous 3 Rules of knowledge management to 7 Principles.
1. Knowledge can only be volunteered, it cannot be conscripted.
2. We only know what we know when we need to know it.
3. In the context of real need few people will withhold their knowledge.
4. Everything is fragmented.
5. Tolerated failure imprints learning better than success.
6. The way we know things is not the way we report we know things.
7. We always know more than we can say, and we always say more than we can write down.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 10:04 AM 0 comments
Labels: Knowledge Management
Via Stephen Downes.
An Introduction to REST by Joe Gregorio.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 11:26 AM 0 comments
Labels: Web 2.0
A video of some Googlers talking about the past and future at Google... A great network of smart people that I'd love to join one day...
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 11:44 AM 0 comments
Labels: Google
Terry Anderson has given a presentation on "Groups, Networks and Collectives" to CCK08. The presentation is available on blip and the related paper can be downloaded here.
According to Terry "each of us participates in groups, networks, and collectives". While I do agree with the difference Terry made between the three social forms, I do not see that we are merely members of groups/communities or nodes in networks/collectives. In my opinion each of us is at the center of her very own personal knowledge network.
YOU are the sun and everything travels around YOU...
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 12:29 PM 0 comments
Labels: CCK08, Communities, Connectivism, Knowledge Ecology, Knowledge Management, Learning Management, Social Software, Web 2.0
Interesting thoughts in this post by Dave Pollard. Dave writes:
My experience suggests that some of the greatest challenges to doing 'good' work are knowledge and learning related:
- Most people are ignorant of how the world really works.
- We live in a world of great imaginative poverty, with a dearth of practical ideas about how to make work, and our world, better.
- Our conversational skills are abysmal.
- While we learn mostly from conversation, from being shown, and thenceforth from practice (all collaborative processes), our learning institutions, programs and systems deprive us of all three, and instead force us to try to learn from reading, listening, and being told (all individual processes), after which we are expected to be 'expert' without any real practice.
- This individualized approach to knowledge leads us to depend on 'experts', 'executives', 'managers' and 'consultants' and build systems that are hierarchical and support a cult of leadership, instead of drawing on collective knowledge, collaboration and community and building systems that are egalitarian and cooperative.
- We are propagandized to be competitive and to lack empathy for others, which deprives us of the will and opportunity to work and learn collaboratively and to share knowledge with others.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 2:47 PM 0 comments
Labels: Connectivism, Knowledge Management, Learning Management
Via Stephen Downes and Brent Schlenker.
A video by Daniel Willingham, Professor of Cognitive Psychology at the University of Virginia, explaining why Learning Styles don't exist.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 9:51 AM 0 comments
Labels: Learning Management
Google has just launched a new homepage for Google Blog Search.
Michael Cohen, Product Manager at Google writes:
Adapting some of the technology pioneered by Google News, we're now showing categories on the left side of the website and organizing the blog posts within those categories into clusters, which are groupings of posts about the same story or event. Grouping them in clusters lets you see the best posts on a story or get a variety of perspectives. When you look within a cluster, you'll find a collection of the most interesting and recent posts on the topic, along with a timeline graph that shows you how the story is gaining momentum in the blogosphere.
Posted by Prof. Dr. Mohamed Amine Chatti at 11:42 AM 0 comments
Labels: Google